CMS Expands RADV Audits for 2025: What PCPs Need to Know
CMS now audits all eligible Medicare Advantage contracts annually, with stricter documentation rules that require diagnoses to be clearly supported by provider-authored medical records. This post outlines key changes, compliance risks, and how primary care teams can prepare.
Yan Mei Jiang, CPC, CPMA, CRC
11/9/20251 min read
In a major shift for Medicare Advantage oversight, CMS has announced the expansion of its Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audits. Starting in 2025, all eligible MA contracts will be audited annually, with a renewed focus on documentation integrity and payment accuracy. This includes retrospective audits for 2018–2024.
What’s Changing?
CMS’s May 2025 press release outlines a more aggressive audit strategy:
“Beginning immediately, CMS will audit all eligible Medicare Advantage contracts for each payment year in all newly initiated audits…”
“CMS confirms that any diagnoses submitted by an MAO for risk adjustment are supported in the enrollees' medical records. If diagnoses are unsupported… CMS may collect overpayments.”
— CMS.gov Press Release
Documentation Standards: No More “Chart-Only” Diagnoses
To pass CMS audits, documentation must meet stricter standards:
Diagnoses must be linked to clinical care—not just listed in the chart.
Provider-authored notes are required. Coders cannot validate diagnoses without direct documentation from a qualified clinician.
Templates and workflows must be updated to reflect new audit criteria.
Unsupported codes may trigger payment clawbacks, even if previously accepted.
What This Means for Primary Care
Primary care teams play a central role in risk adjustment—and now face greater responsibility:
Annual Wellness Visits and HRAs must include actionable documentation.
Prospective risk workflows should flag unsupported diagnoses before submission.
Audit prep should include mock RADV reviews, especially for high-risk HCCs.
Education is critical: Providers must understand that documentation drives payment integrity, not just coding.
Common High-Risk HCCs to Watch
While CMS doesn’t label HCCs as “high-risk,” these categories often trigger audit scrutiny due to their impact on risk scores and documentation complexity:
HCC 18/37: Diabetes with chronic complications
HCC 85/226: Congestive Heart Failure
HCC 96/238: Specified Heart Arrhythmias
HCC 108: Vascular Disease
HCC 111/280: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
HCC 12/23: Prostate Cancer
HCC 12/23: Breast Cancer
HCC 158/381: Pressure Ulcers
HCC 47/114: Severe Hematological Disorders
HCC 136/326: End-Stage Renal Disease
These often require:
Clear linkage to clinical care
Provider-authored documentation
Evidence of treatment, monitoring, or follow-up
How We’re Supporting You
At ProTrust Billing Partners, we’re updating our audit logic, provider education, and reporting workflows to align with CMS’s expanded RADV criteria. Our goal is to help PCPs:
Document with confidence
Avoid compliance pitfalls
Capture risk accurately and ethically
Need help refining your documentation or preparing for audits? Reach out—we’re here to support your success.
